Waterfall vs agile
Waterfall and Agile are two distinct methodologies for software development and project management. The Waterfall model is a linear and sequential approach where project phases, such as requirements analysis, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance, are completed in order, with little room for revisiting earlier stages. This makes it well-suited for projects with clearly defined requirements and minimal expected changes. In contrast, Agile emphasizes flexibility and iterative progress, allowing teams to work in short cycles (sprints) and adapt to changes as they arise. Agile promotes collaboration, customer feedback, and continuous improvement, making it more suitable for projects where requirements may evolve or are not fully understood from the outset. While Waterfall can provide structure in predictable environments, Agile enables quicker responses to change, fostering innovation and user satisfaction.
To Download Our Brochure: https://www.justacademy.co/download-brochure-for-free
Message us for more information: +91 9987184296
1 - Definition:
Waterfall: A linear and sequential approach where each phase must be completed before the next begins.
Agile: An iterative and incremental approach that emphasizes flexibility and customer feedback throughout the development process.
2) Phases:
Waterfall: Involves distinct phases such as requirements, design, implementation, verification, and maintenance.
Agile: Focuses on short cycles called sprints or iterations, typically lasting 1 4 weeks, allowing for continuous development and testing.
3) Flexibility:
Waterfall: Rigid structure; changes during the development process can be difficult and costly to implement.
Agile: Highly flexible and adaptive; changes can be made easily based on feedback and evolving requirements.
4) Customer Involvement:
Waterfall: Limited customer involvement after the initial requirements phase; clients see the end product only at completion.
Agile: Continuous involvement of stakeholders and customers throughout the project, providing regular feedback.
5) Documentation:
Waterfall: Heavy emphasis on comprehensive documentation at every stage, which can become burdensome.
Agile: Light and adaptive documentation that focuses more on communication and collaboration than formal records.
6) Risk Management:
Waterfall: Higher risk due to late testing and feedback, which can lead to discovering major issues only after the project is complete.
Agile: Reduced risk through ongoing testing and feedback, allowing for early identification and resolution of issues.
7) Project Size:
Waterfall: Suited for smaller projects with well defined requirements and minimal changes expected.
Agile: Better for larger, complex projects where requirements may evolve and change over time.
8) Quality Control:
Waterfall: Testing occurs at the end of the development process, potentially leading to late discovery of bugs.
Agile: Continuous testing and quality assurance during each sprint, ensuring higher product quality.
9) Delivery Time:
Waterfall: Often results in longer delivery times, as the entire project is completed before it is delivered.
Agile: Allows for incremental deliveries, providing functional pieces of the project at the end of each iteration.
10) Team Collaboration:
Waterfall: Team collaboration tends to be less dynamic, with silos between roles and phases.
Agile: Encourages high collaboration and communication among cross functional team members.
11) Change Management:
Waterfall: Managing changes is cumbersome; a formal change request process is required.
Agile: Embraces change; team members can adapt and respond to new input at any stage.
12) Feedback Loops:
Waterfall: Feedback is typically gathered only at the end of the project or phase.
Agile: Short feedback loops allow teams to respond rapidly to user needs and preferences.
13) Mindset:
Waterfall: Emphasizes a planned, upfront approach based on thorough analysis before execution.
Agile: Prioritizes a culture of continuous improvement, learning, and iterative progress.
14) Use Cases:
Waterfall: Often used in construction, manufacturing, or projects with very clear requirements (e.g., government contracts).
Agile: Common in software development, marketing, and projects requiring rapid delivery and customer interaction.
15) Success Metrics:
Waterfall: Success is measured by adherence to original plans, timelines, and budget constraints.
Agile: Success is gauged by customer satisfaction, product quality, and the team's ability to adapt and respond.
These points provide a comprehensive view which can aid students in understanding the fundamental differences between Waterfall and Agile methodologies, preparing them for various project environments they may encounter in their careers.
Browse our course links : https://www.justacademy.co/all-courses
To Join our FREE DEMO Session: Click Here
Contact Us for more info:
core java training institutes in gachibowli
Best Java Institute in Chennai
I am learning flutter from JustAcademy, They provide very much great environment where people gather and work simultaneously. totally project based training institute.
Awesome Experience. I am a Front-end Web Designer working at Star India for 3 years now. I applied for Full-stack development and my experience has been phenomenal & they really do help with placements exceptionally. Thank you Roshan sir so much.
Flutter app monitoring with Prometheus and Grafana delivers real-time observability by instrumenting the app (via OpenTelemetry or lightweight exporters) to expose metrics that Prometheus scrapes and stores as time-series data. Grafana visualizes those metrics in customizable dashboards and triggers alerts, letting teams track CPU/memory, frame-render times, network latency, error rates and user-impacting regressions. This stack helps quickly detect performance problems, diagnose root causes, and continuously improve app stability and user experience.
Flutter CI with Codemagic is a cloud-first continuous integration and delivery solution that automates building, testing and releasing Flutter apps across iOS, Android and web using configurable workflows (codemagic.yaml), hosted macOS/Linux runners, dependency caching and parallelization. It integrates with GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket, manages code signing and store publishing, runs unit/widget/integration tests, and generates reproducible artifacts so teams catch regressions early and ship reliably. For learners and professionals working on JustAcademy real-time projects, Codemagic removes the overhead of maintaining CI infrastructure, speeds iteration, and provides a repeatable pipeline for demonstrating and delivering polished app releases.
Using Flutter's Hot UI (hot reload and hot restart) lets developers inject code changes into a running app and see updated layouts, styles and behaviours instantly without losing app state, making it ideal for rapid prototyping. This real-time feedback loop accelerates iteration on widgets, animations and responsive designs, improves collaboration between designers and engineers, and dramatically shortens the path from idea to working MVP.
In 2025, pairing Flutter with Supabase vs Firebase means choosing between an open‑source, Postgres‑first backend and a mature Google serverless platform: Supabase gives Flutter apps SQL‑centric workflows, real‑time subscriptions, row‑level security and lower vendor lock‑in with predictable costs and direct SQL access, while Firebase offers Firestore, Auth, Functions, Analytics, polished SDKs, global scaling and turnkey managed features (offline sync, analytics, A/B testing). Both speed cross‑platform development and real‑time experiences; pick Supabase for relational control and openness, or Firebase for convenience and a broader managed ecosystem.
In 2025, Flutter and NativeScript are both mature cross-platform frameworks with different strengths: Flutter (Dart) compiles to native code and provides a rich, cohesive widget-driven UI, excellent performance, and consistent look across mobile, web and desktop, making it ideal for visually complex apps and teams that want a single expressive UI layer; NativeScript (TypeScript/JavaScript) maps directly to native UI components and gives seamless access to platform APIs, appealing to teams with strong JS/TS skills who need native look-and-feel and tight platform integration—choose Flutter for unified UI control and performance, NativeScript for native parity and easier reuse of web/JS expertise.
Flutter CI/CD with GitHub Actions is a complete tutorial-style guide that shows how to automate building, testing, signing, and deploying Flutter apps using GitHub’s workflow runner; it covers creating YAML workflows to run platform-specific builds (Android/iOS), caching dependencies, running unit/widget/integration tests, managing secrets and code signing, generating artifacts, and releasing to stores or distribution channels. By following the tutorial, developers and JustAcademy learners can enforce consistent quality, catch regressions early, speed up delivery of real-time projects, and adopt industry-standard DevOps practices that make app releases reproducible and reliable.
AI-generated UI in Flutter uses machine learning to convert design files or natural-language prompts into responsive Dart widgets, automating layout, styling, accessibility and cross-platform tweaks so prototypes and production-ready screens can be produced far faster with fewer manual edits; this streamlines collaboration between designers and developers, lets teams focus on business logic and performance, and—as models and tooling improve—will become a core part of development workflows, accelerating app delivery and hands-on learning for learners and professionals at JustAcademy.
Optimizing network calls in Flutter with Dio means using Dio’s rich HTTP client features—centralized configuration and interceptors for headers, auth, logging and error handling; request cancellation, timeouts and concurrency control; retry strategies (exponential backoff); and response caching/compression—to reduce latency, save bandwidth and improve reliability. By encapsulating API logic in a configured Dio instance, applying retries and backoff, caching frequent responses, and handling errors consistently, apps become faster, more resilient and easier to maintain—especially important for real-time project work and production-ready certifications like those at JustAcademy.
JustAcademy’s "Deploy Flutter to Firebase: A Step-by-Step Tutorial" is a concise guide that walks you through preparing a Flutter app, configuring Firebase services (Authentication, Firestore, Hosting), and using the Firebase CLI to build and deploy your app—covering both web hosting and integration for Android/iOS where relevant. It explains creating a Firebase project, adding platform-specific Firebase SDKs, adjusting app settings, running production builds, initializing Firebase Hosting, and performing the final deploy, with tips for testing and automating releases via CI/CD. By following the tutorial, developers get a practical, end-to-end workflow to ship scalable, real-time Flutter apps quickly and reliably.
Flutter Desktop keyboard shortcuts let you define and handle platform-consistent key bindings (like Ctrl/Cmd combinations) to trigger app commands without a mouse. Using Flutter’s Shortcuts, Actions, and Intents APIs (or lower-level RawKeyboard events), you map logical key sets to intent objects and implement actions that run when those intents are invoked, while respecting focus and accessibility so shortcuts work predictably across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
