Fast API vs Django
FastAPI is a modern Python web framework that is specifically designed for building APIs quickly and efficiently. It is known for its high performance and straightforward approach to creating web services, with features like automatic validation, serialization, and documentation from function signatures. On the other hand, Django is a full-featured web framework that provides all the tools necessary for building complex web applications, including an ORM, admin interface, and authentication system. While Django is more mature and established, FastAPI offers better performance and a more lightweight approach for API development. Ultimately, the choice between FastAPI and Django will depend on the specific requirements and complexity of the project at hand.
To Download Our Brochure: https://www.justacademy.co/download-brochure-for-free
Message us for more information: +91 9987184296
1 - FastAPI is a modern Python web framework that is designed for building APIs quickly and efficiently, whereas Django is a high level Python web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
2) FastAPI is known for its high performance due to its asynchronous capabilities and use of type hints for input validation, making it suitable for applications that require low latency responses. On the other hand, Django provides a full stack framework with built in components like ORM, authentication, and admin interface, which can lead to faster initial setup, especially for traditional web applications.
3) FastAPI's design is heavily influenced by type annotations and automatic OpenAPI documentation generation, making it ideal for building RESTful APIs. Django, on the other hand, follows the MVC (Model View Controller) pattern, which provides a more structured approach for handling web requests and responses.
4) FastAPI is relatively newer compared to Django, which has been around for a longer time and has a larger community and ecosystem of third party packages and extensions.
5) FastAPI leverages Python 3.6+ features such as type hints and async/await for improved code readability and maintainability. Django, on the other hand, supports older versions of Python and has a more mature codebase with comprehensive documentation.
6) FastAPI's focus on performance and scalability makes it well suited for building microservices and high throughput applications. Django's batteries included approach, with features like built in admin interface and user authentication, offers a more streamlined development experience for traditional web applications.
7) FastAPI provides built in support for data validation, serialization, and automatic API documentation using tools like Pydantic and OpenAPI. Django offers its own form validation and serialization mechanisms, along with tools like Django REST framework for building APIs.
8) FastAPI's dependency injection system makes it easier to manage dependencies and testing, while Django's module system and middleware architecture provide flexibility in extending and customizing applications.
9) FastAPI's automatic validation and serialization of request and response data can lead to faster development cycles and fewer errors during API development. Django's built in features like ORM and templating engine simplify common web development tasks but may require more configuration for custom requirements.
10) FastAPI's focus on modern standards like OpenAPI and JSON Schema makes it a strong contender for developing APIs that adhere to industry best practices. Django's rich ecosystem of plugins and extensions can provide additional functionality and support for a wide range of web development needs.
11) FastAPI offers better performance compared to Django due to its asynchronous capabilities and efficient request handling. This makes it a suitable choice for developing real time applications and services that require high concurrency.
12) FastAPI's automatic generation of OpenAPI documentation makes it easier to document APIs and communicate their functionality to other developers. Django provides a similar feature through tools like Django REST framework, but may require more manual configuration.
13) FastAPI's simplicity and ease of use for building APIs make it a great choice for beginners and developers looking to quickly prototype and deploy API services. Django's robust set of features and conventions provide a more comprehensive framework for building complex web applications.
14) FastAPI's support for asynchronous programming allows for handling multiple requests concurrently, leading to improved performance and scalability compared to Django's synchronous execution model. This can be beneficial for training programs focusing on teaching students about building high performance applications.
15) In conclusion, both FastAPI and Django have their strengths and weaknesses when it comes to developing web applications and APIs. FastAPI excels in performance and modern API development practices, while Django provides a more established and feature rich framework for traditional web development. Choosing between them depends on the specific requirements of the training program and the goals of the students involved.
Browse our course links : https://www.justacademy.co/all-courses
To Join our FREE DEMO Session: Click Here
Contact Us for more info:
I am learning flutter from JustAcademy, They provide very much great environment where people gather and work simultaneously. totally project based training institute.
Awesome Experience. I am a Front-end Web Designer working at Star India for 3 years now. I applied for Full-stack development and my experience has been phenomenal & they really do help with placements exceptionally. Thank you Roshan sir so much.
Flutter app monitoring with Prometheus and Grafana delivers real-time observability by instrumenting the app (via OpenTelemetry or lightweight exporters) to expose metrics that Prometheus scrapes and stores as time-series data. Grafana visualizes those metrics in customizable dashboards and triggers alerts, letting teams track CPU/memory, frame-render times, network latency, error rates and user-impacting regressions. This stack helps quickly detect performance problems, diagnose root causes, and continuously improve app stability and user experience.
Flutter CI with Codemagic is a cloud-first continuous integration and delivery solution that automates building, testing and releasing Flutter apps across iOS, Android and web using configurable workflows (codemagic.yaml), hosted macOS/Linux runners, dependency caching and parallelization. It integrates with GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket, manages code signing and store publishing, runs unit/widget/integration tests, and generates reproducible artifacts so teams catch regressions early and ship reliably. For learners and professionals working on JustAcademy real-time projects, Codemagic removes the overhead of maintaining CI infrastructure, speeds iteration, and provides a repeatable pipeline for demonstrating and delivering polished app releases.
Using Flutter's Hot UI (hot reload and hot restart) lets developers inject code changes into a running app and see updated layouts, styles and behaviours instantly without losing app state, making it ideal for rapid prototyping. This real-time feedback loop accelerates iteration on widgets, animations and responsive designs, improves collaboration between designers and engineers, and dramatically shortens the path from idea to working MVP.
In 2025, pairing Flutter with Supabase vs Firebase means choosing between an open‑source, Postgres‑first backend and a mature Google serverless platform: Supabase gives Flutter apps SQL‑centric workflows, real‑time subscriptions, row‑level security and lower vendor lock‑in with predictable costs and direct SQL access, while Firebase offers Firestore, Auth, Functions, Analytics, polished SDKs, global scaling and turnkey managed features (offline sync, analytics, A/B testing). Both speed cross‑platform development and real‑time experiences; pick Supabase for relational control and openness, or Firebase for convenience and a broader managed ecosystem.
In 2025, Flutter and NativeScript are both mature cross-platform frameworks with different strengths: Flutter (Dart) compiles to native code and provides a rich, cohesive widget-driven UI, excellent performance, and consistent look across mobile, web and desktop, making it ideal for visually complex apps and teams that want a single expressive UI layer; NativeScript (TypeScript/JavaScript) maps directly to native UI components and gives seamless access to platform APIs, appealing to teams with strong JS/TS skills who need native look-and-feel and tight platform integration—choose Flutter for unified UI control and performance, NativeScript for native parity and easier reuse of web/JS expertise.
Flutter CI/CD with GitHub Actions is a complete tutorial-style guide that shows how to automate building, testing, signing, and deploying Flutter apps using GitHub’s workflow runner; it covers creating YAML workflows to run platform-specific builds (Android/iOS), caching dependencies, running unit/widget/integration tests, managing secrets and code signing, generating artifacts, and releasing to stores or distribution channels. By following the tutorial, developers and JustAcademy learners can enforce consistent quality, catch regressions early, speed up delivery of real-time projects, and adopt industry-standard DevOps practices that make app releases reproducible and reliable.
AI-generated UI in Flutter uses machine learning to convert design files or natural-language prompts into responsive Dart widgets, automating layout, styling, accessibility and cross-platform tweaks so prototypes and production-ready screens can be produced far faster with fewer manual edits; this streamlines collaboration between designers and developers, lets teams focus on business logic and performance, and—as models and tooling improve—will become a core part of development workflows, accelerating app delivery and hands-on learning for learners and professionals at JustAcademy.
Optimizing network calls in Flutter with Dio means using Dio’s rich HTTP client features—centralized configuration and interceptors for headers, auth, logging and error handling; request cancellation, timeouts and concurrency control; retry strategies (exponential backoff); and response caching/compression—to reduce latency, save bandwidth and improve reliability. By encapsulating API logic in a configured Dio instance, applying retries and backoff, caching frequent responses, and handling errors consistently, apps become faster, more resilient and easier to maintain—especially important for real-time project work and production-ready certifications like those at JustAcademy.
JustAcademy’s "Deploy Flutter to Firebase: A Step-by-Step Tutorial" is a concise guide that walks you through preparing a Flutter app, configuring Firebase services (Authentication, Firestore, Hosting), and using the Firebase CLI to build and deploy your app—covering both web hosting and integration for Android/iOS where relevant. It explains creating a Firebase project, adding platform-specific Firebase SDKs, adjusting app settings, running production builds, initializing Firebase Hosting, and performing the final deploy, with tips for testing and automating releases via CI/CD. By following the tutorial, developers get a practical, end-to-end workflow to ship scalable, real-time Flutter apps quickly and reliably.
Flutter Desktop keyboard shortcuts let you define and handle platform-consistent key bindings (like Ctrl/Cmd combinations) to trigger app commands without a mouse. Using Flutter’s Shortcuts, Actions, and Intents APIs (or lower-level RawKeyboard events), you map logical key sets to intent objects and implement actions that run when those intents are invoked, while respecting focus and accessibility so shortcuts work predictably across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
